Post Concussion Syndrome – Diagnosing and Treating for All Risk Factors

1 comment

Posted on 4th January 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , , ,

I said this last week on my Justice and American Politics blog,
In the days after a concussion, the brain is trying mightily to rewire itself to deal with the new challenges. That rewiring is not always positive. Add panic or emotional distress and the plasticity that we all hope will avoid negative consequences, can rewire the brain in the wrong ways. I call this “negative plasticity” and I believe it is one of the strongest arguments for better and more thorough diagnosis and follow-up for concussion.
To answer that question one must first define the term “plasticity.” I found a great definition of it at:

Brain plasticity refers to the brain’s lifelong capacity for physical and functional change; it is this capacity that enables experience to induce learning throughout life. Research in this field has demonstrated that the adult brain continuously adapts to disproportionately represent relevant sensory stimuli and behavioral outputs with well coordinated populations of neurons. This adaptation is achieved by engaging competitive processes in brain networks that refine the selective representations of sensory inputs or motor actions, typically resulting in increased strengths of cortical resources devoted to, and enhanced representational fidelity of, the learned stimulus or behavior.

In severe brain injury lingo, plasticity is the capacity of one part of brain to take on the function of a part of the brain which is damaged. But as the brain has the capacity to rewire itself in positive ways, so can it in negative ways.

As long as I have been doing Post Concussion Syndrome cases, I have been asking myself this question: Why is there this significant subset of people who have such bad results from an injury that the majority of people have apparent full recoveries, within days if not hours? This small minority of people that fall into the symptomatic category have been referred to most often as either the “miserable minority” (Ron Ruff, neuropsychologist) or as suffering from the Persistent Post Concussive Syndrome. “PPCS” (Michael Alexander, M.D. , Neurology, 1995). That “miserable minority” of people consistently make up between 5 and 15% of those who suffer a concussion or mild traumatic brain injury. What explains this divergent outcome for this PPCS group?

I believe there are a number of issues. First, some of them have far more than a “simple concussion.” This portion have fairly serious brain injuries but because the symptoms of those concussions occurred when they were not being monitored by medical professionals, the severity of the brain injury is grossly underrated.

Second, some of them have other neurological injuries, which again, went misdiagnosed. The most common among this group are those with vestibular disorders. See Symptoms of dizziness, balance and vertigo can put significant demands upon the brains attentional resources and account for many of the cognitive and emotional complaints associated with the post concussion syndrome. In my career, I have found nearly a 50% incidence of vestibular disorder among my clients.

Third, there may be an artery dissection that happened contemporaneously with the head injury or as a result of treatment for the head injury, particularly from a chiropractor. Artery dissections can cause a stroke, with resultant moderate to severe brain damage.

Fourth, the brain injured person may be emotionally more vulnerable than the 85 to 90% of those who have good recoveries. This is likely the most significant factor and is the area where my term of “negative plasticity” comes into play. While the evidence of this particular component of concussion pathology is incomplete, I believe that as we learn more about the limbic system and the axonal connections between it and the lower frontal lobes, the emotional component of concussion recovery will become a huge field of discovery and potentially treatment.

What is the reason this is important in a week when a football coach gets fired for locking an athlete with a concussion up in a dark place? There is a major overlap between PTSD and the post concussion syndrome. After all, both are “all in the head”. “All in the head” means it is in the brain. There is not a bright line of demarcation between emotional injury and organic or “hard wire” injury in the brain. In all likelihood, there is no line at all. If you damage a person’s emotional center, regardless of whether you do so by direct trauma or via emotional rewiring, the hard wiring change is the same.

Concussion survivors need the best treatment, not just to protect them from repeat trauma’s, but also to protect the vulnerable brain from negative rewiring. A concussion in its infancy can become a life long disability if the vulnerable brain is neglected or abused. We worry about “shaken baby syndrome”. We should also worry about the neglected emotional state of all brains that are injured.

Mike Leach Firing Clearly Justified by Evidence of Abuse of Brain Injured Athlete

1 comment

Posted on 3rd January 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

Texas Tech has won its bowl game without the Concussion abuser Mike Leach as its head coach. Leach was fired on Thursday, just before his hearing to force reinstatement. The court case was odd, especially since Leach chose to try his case in the media with out of context claims of support from the team doctor and trainer. As reported by the New York Times, neither the trainer nor the team doctor are supporting his treatment of Adam James. See

A Texas Tech athletic trainer said he was told by the fired coach Mike Leach to lock wide receiver Adam James in the dark after doctors determined that he had a concussion, according to an affidavit released Saturday by the university.

According to the NY Times story:

In a Dec. 21 interview with a university investigative attorney looking into James’s treatment, Steve Pincock, Texas Tech’s head football trainer, said he told James he was sorry about placing him inside an equipment shed on Dec. 17 near the practice field. According to the affidavit, Pincock also said he was not aware that any other player had ever been treated in such a manner.

“I do not agree with this form of treatment for anyone,” Pincock said in the affidavit.

In describing what Leach told him to do, Pincock quoted the coach as using graphic and profane language about locking James in a dark place, according to the affidavit. Pincock also told the investigator that Leach “wanted James to be uncomfortable,” the affidavit said. Pincock did not return a message left on his cellphone or reply to a text message Saturday.

Despite Leach’s media claims, the team doctor did not support the treatment of James, either. According to the NY Times:

In another affidavit released Saturday by the university, the team physician Michael Phy told the investigator on Dec. 22 that James “may not have been harmed,” but that Phy considered “this practice inappropriate.” In the statement announcing Leach’s firing, Texas Tech said Leach’s actions put James “at risk for additional injury.”
As I said on one of my other blogs last week, while isolation does not necessarily expose the injured brain to any new physical forces, it can expose the brain to additional stress, which can result in further Post Concussion Syndrome problems. See

Last year was a remarkable year for concussion awareness, but we are only scratching the surface of treating the secondary effects of concussion, especially those that involve emotional stressors. I hope the Leach chapter stays in the media focus long enough to get some of the leading thinkers on concussion to educate on this issue further.