Will NFL Crackdown On Helmet-To-Helmet Hits Turn Players Into Pansies?

0 comments

Posted on 23rd October 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, ,

Well, it didn’t take long for players to blast the National Football League for cracking down on helmet-to-helmet hits. 

One of the three players fined for a particularly violent Sunday of the game last weekend, with concussions galore, went so far as to threaten to retire. That player was Pittsburgh Steelers James Harrison, who complained on Sirius XM Radio that the NFL was “handicapping” him.

“How can I continue to play this game the way that I’ve been taught to play this game since I was 10 years old,” Harrison griped. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/21/sports/football/21hits.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

Harrison’s threat to walk came the same week that the NFL sent a video to all 32 of its teams, a video that included shots of the three tackles that prompted large fines being imposed on players. One of those depicted was the move that got Harrison’s penalized to the tune of $75,000: His hit of Cleveland Brown’s receiver Mohammed Massaguoi.    

On the video, NFL exectuive vice president of operations Ray Anderson read the riot act to players, saying, “Illegal hits to the head of an opponent will not tolerated. A player is accountable for what he hits.”

The argument from the players is essentially that they are big boys, when they signed their contracts they knew football was a violent game, and they are willing to take the risk of being injured, including being “concussed,” as some stories put it.

In one of the most ridiculously sarcastic and stereotypically macho comments I read, Miami Dolphins linebacker Channing Crowder said, “If they’re going to keep making us go more and more and more like a feminine sport, we’re going to wear pink every game, not just on the breast cancer months.”  

The NFL’s video didn’t go over too well in the New York Giants’ locker room, either, according to a story in the New York Daily News. It was headlined, “Big Blue Hits Back: Giants Players On Collision Course With NFL Over Rules.”

 http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/giants/2010/10/22/2010-10-22_big_blue_hits_back.html

Giants running back Brandon Jacobs called the NFL’s whip-cracking “insane.” Other Giants said it will make players “soft,”  and prompt them to miss tackles rather than risk being fined.

For my part, I’d say that players signed up for a violent game expecting broken bones and torn muscles. But they did not know then about the long term, and cumulative, effect of repeated concussions. 

Perhaps an attempt to have a conversation with some of the retired NFL players who have developed dementia at an early age would convince make some of these players change their minds about helmet-to-helmet hits.

Maybe, I don’t know.  Maybe they’ve already taken too many hits to the head to really understand.

I do know that the NFL is going to have rough going getting players to buy into their crackdown. And that’s a shame.

 

NFL Backs Down After Threat To Suspend, Not Just Fine, Players For Helmet Hits

0 comments

Posted on 21st October 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, ,

 It looks like the National Football League didn’t have the guts to make good on its threat. 

Just one day after threatening to suspend players for making helmet-to-helmet hits, on Tuesday the league instead just fined the three players who wreaked havoc in games over the weekend, when several injuries took place. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/sports/football/20hits.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

The NFL’s logic is that it wants to give teams and players “fair warning” that it plans to really crack down on brain-injuring helmet-to-helmet hits and safety-rule violations. Th NFL said that on Wednesday it planned to tell coaches, players and teams that the next punishments it metes out will be much worse, and could include suspensions.

Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker James Harrison was fined $75,000 for helmet-to-helmet hits that injured two Cleveland Browns players, putting them out of the game. 

New England Patriots safety Brandon Meriweather, who “launched himself into Baltimore Ravens tight end Todd Heap,” according to The New York Times, was fined $50,000 by the NFL.

Finally, Atlanta Falcon quarterback Dunta Robinson was fined $50,000 for hitting Philadephia Eagles receiver DeSean Jackson so hard that they both sustained concussions.

The Times reported that in a letter to all three fined players Ray Anderson, the NFL’s senior vice president of football operations, wrote that “future offenses will result in an escalation of fines up to and including suspensions.”

I’ll believe it when I see it. On Monday Anderson had conceded that suspensions, not fines, would be the real deterrent to make players stop helmet-to-helmet hits. Then the league only fines the players anyway.  

My New York Colleague Says NFL Is ‘Disenguous” On Ex-Player Brain Injury And Disability Payments

0 comments

Posted on 1st August 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, ,

One of my traumatic brain injury colleagues in New York, attorney Michael Kaplen, called the National Football League to task for merely paying “lip service” to concerns about the long-term damage of concussions. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/sports/01inbox.html?_r=2

In a letter published July 31 by The New York Times, Kaplen cited a July 26 story that I blogged about, “NFL Asserts Greater Risk of Head Injury.” That was a story about the NFL getting to put up locker room signs warning players about the effects of concussions, one of the league’s first major admissions of the link between injuries on the field and dementia in later years.

 http://www.tbilaw.com/blog/2010/07/nfl-owns-up-to-long-term-dangers-of-concussions-in-new-locker-room-poster.html

Kaplen, chairman of the New York State Traumatic Brain Injury Services Coordinating Council, thinks the NFL is being “disengenous” by, on the one hand drafting the new warning poster, but still refusing to grant full disability to retired players who now have early-onset dementia, memory loss and cognitive problems. 

“The continuous refusal by the lawyers retained by the N.F.L. to accept the association between long-term disability and concussions exemplifies their disingenuous position when confronting the issue of brain damage,” Kaplen wrote to The Times’s sports editor. “It is implausible that these lawyers are acting without the full knowledge and approval of their client.”

Here is the rest of Kaplen’s letter:

“The league is now doing a better job of paying lip service to acknowledging the long-term disability associated with concussions. But it remains steadfast in its refusal to fulfill its fiduciary obligations under the disability retirement plan and adequately compensate those players who have sacrificed their brains and lives while the league owners have continued to reap the financial benefits.

It would be interesting to know what initiatives the league was undertaking to review the disability files of all those players who have been wrongfully denied brain-injury-associated disability payments, with their purported better understanding of traumatic brain injury.

It may be that the only way to obtain justice for these players is to require a truly independent review of these files or surrender the cloak of immunity behind which the league hides and consent to a full and fair court hearing.”

I couldn’t have said it better myself, Michael.